Context:
A global retail chain sought to identify the most suitable forest certification scheme for its operations, taking into account both international frameworks and regional/local certification providers, while aligning with its corporate sustainability policies and values.

Solution:
Conducted an in-depth comparative analysis of forest certification schemes available in the target region, assessing their alignment with the client’s sustainability criteria and guiding principles.

Project Duration:
3 weeks

Project Team:

• Lead Consultant (myself)
• Research Assistant

Deliverables:

• Comparative analysis tables (XLS)
• Synthesis report summarizing findings and recommendations (DOC)

Project Approach:

1. Compiled a comprehensive list of all forest certification schemes operating in the region.
2. Developed and validated the research framework, format, and preliminary content structure with the client.
3. Engaged with certification bodies and industry experts to gather nuanced, insider insights.
4. Reviewed and analyzed the content of certification standards, organizing findings according to the client’s sustainability priorities to enable direct comparison across schemes.
5. Delivered a final package including detailed comparison tables and a synthesis report, highlighting the certification schemes that best (and least) matched the client’s needs.

Outcomes:

• Enabled the client to make an informed, evidence-based decision on the most suitable forest certification scheme aligned with their sustainability values and operational context.
• Provided a clear, side-by-side comparison of certification schemes, saving time and internal resources in the decision-making process.
• Enhanced the client’s understanding of regional certification nuances and stakeholder expectations through expert insights.
• Established a replicable evaluation framework for future supplier or certification assessments.